On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:20:40AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sunday 24 June 2001 12:36, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe.
> > > Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity.
> >
> > Ah, the DR-DOS
On Sunday 24 June 2001 12:36, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe.
> > Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity.
>
> Ah, the DR-DOS answer to dosshell/windows. Cool. (I used Dr. Dos byt
> never tried its
On Sunday 24 June 2001 12:36, Rob Landley wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe.
Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity.
Ah, the DR-DOS answer to dosshell/windows. Cool. (I used Dr. Dos byt
never tried its gui.)
GEM
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:20:40AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Sunday 24 June 2001 12:36, Rob Landley wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe.
Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity.
Ah, the DR-DOS answer to
4 matches
Mail list logo