On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:34:48 Stefan Richter wrote:
> On Oct 22 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 October 2015 04:05:00 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> > > 32 bit systems using 'struct timeval' will break in the year 2038, so
> > > we replace the code appropriately. However, this driver
On Oct 22 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 04:05:00 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> > 32 bit systems using 'struct timeval' will break in the year 2038, so
> > we replace the code appropriately. However, this driver is not broken
> > in 2038 since we are using only the microseconds
On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:34:48 Stefan Richter wrote:
> On Oct 22 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 October 2015 04:05:00 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> > > 32 bit systems using 'struct timeval' will break in the year 2038, so
> > > we replace the code appropriately. However, this driver
On Oct 22 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 04:05:00 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> > 32 bit systems using 'struct timeval' will break in the year 2038, so
> > we replace the code appropriately. However, this driver is not broken
> > in 2038 since we are using only the microseconds
On Thursday 22 October 2015 04:05:00 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> 32 bit systems using 'struct timeval' will break in the year 2038, so
> we replace the code appropriately. However, this driver is not broken
> in 2038 since we are using only the microseconds portion of the
> current time.
>
> This
On Thursday 22 October 2015 04:05:00 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> 32 bit systems using 'struct timeval' will break in the year 2038, so
> we replace the code appropriately. However, this driver is not broken
> in 2038 since we are using only the microseconds portion of the
> current time.
>
> This
6 matches
Mail list logo
