Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-03-07 Thread Petri Kaukasoina
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:05:24PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed > non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the > values reported by the kernel and those readable from PCI config space > aren't consistent anymore.

Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-02-14 Thread Alan
> The masking is done primarily to (a) calculate the correct length (from a > BAR's > perspective), as I don't want to write the BAR if its length doesn't match the > expectation, and (b) to properly report the new value in the printk. Ok I guess you have to do something like that since you can't

Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-02-14 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14.02.07 16:40 >>> >On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:05:24 + >"Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed >> non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the >> values reported by the kernel

Re: [PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-02-14 Thread Alan
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:05:24 + "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed > non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the > values reported by the kernel and those readable from PCI config space > aren't con

[PATCH, RFC] adjust legacy IDE resource setting

2007-02-14 Thread Jan Beulich
The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the values reported by the kernel and those readable from PCI config space aren't consistent anymore. Therefore, this patch arranges for the respective BARs to also get u