Em Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 03:08:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:57:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> > I applied your patch and will push it to Ingo, now we must cross our
> > fingers so that Stephen doesn't come back to us once more telling it is
> > stil
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:57:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
>>
>> Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:36:55PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:57:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:36:55PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:19:20PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf esc
Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:36:55PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:19:20PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:37:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:36:55PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:19:20PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:37:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:41:18PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> > >
Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:19:20PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:37:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:41:18PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > It ju
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:37:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:41:18PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > It just looks like objtool was not written with cross compilation in
> > > mind?
Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:41:18PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > It just looks like objtool was not written with cross compilation in
> > mind?
> I don't know yet what the specific problem is, but objtool should work
> fine
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:12:48 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> >
> > Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:29:50AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> > > Hi Arnaldo,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:52:02 -0300
Hi Arnaldo,
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:12:48 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:29:50AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:52:02 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Humm, it seems that the compiler
Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:29:50AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:52:02 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> >
> > Humm, it seems that the compiler used is not the cross one, but the
> > native, check if, say, __powerpc__ is defined.
>
> Yes, __p
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:52:02 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Humm, it seems that the compiler used is not the cross one, but the
> native, check if, say, __powerpc__ is defined.
Yes, __powerpc__ is defined (unsuprisingly).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Arnaldo,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:09:24 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 07:57:24PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski escreveu:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:53:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escr
Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 07:57:24PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> > Em Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:53:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:21:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 19
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:53:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:21:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:45:51 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>> > wrote:
>> > > #if BITS
Em Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:53:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:21:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:45:51 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > wrote:
> > > #if BITS_PER_LONG != __BITS_PER_LONG
> > > +#include
> > > +#pragma message "BIT
Hi Arnaldo,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:21:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:45:51 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> >
> > No such luck, everything works as expected, objtool doesn't even get
> > compiled, likely it doesn't support powerpc binaries so it isn't buil
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:45:51 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> No such luck, everything works as expected, objtool doesn't even get
> compiled, likely it doesn't support powerpc binaries so it isn't built:
right.
> Probably it got the local definition of bitsperlong.h, i.e.
Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:54:43AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:26:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:39:06 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > wrote:
> > > Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:26:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:26:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:39:06 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> >
> > Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:26:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> >
> > > If you have a single patch (or few) relative to yes
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:39:06 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:26:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
>
> > If you have a single patch (or few) relative to yesterday's tip tree,
> > please send it to me as well and I will apply it as a fix patc
Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:26:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:41:32 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> > Ok, one of the possible reasons was for tools/{include,lib,perf,objtool}
> > code to be including code directly from the kernel, and that was still
> > t
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:41:32 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Ok, one of the possible reasons was for tools/{include,lib,perf,objtool}
> code to be including code directly from the kernel, and that was still
> the case for some headers, I fixed those and pushed to Ingo now,
Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:22:35AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> >
> > Em Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:04:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski escreveu:
> > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> > >
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Em Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:04:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski escreveu:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:43:26 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > w
Em Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:04:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski escreveu:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:43:26 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > wrote:
> >> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack? Stephen, does it work
> >> for yo
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:43:26 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack? Stephen, does it work
>> for you?
>
> Sorry, no. See my other email.
>
> I am cross building
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:43:26 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
>
> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack? Stephen, does it work
> for you?
Sorry, no. See my other email.
I am cross building (if that makes a difference).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 07/15/16 09:28, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 05:49:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:43:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack?
>>
>> Sure. Although I'm still somewhat puzzled
Em Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 05:49:30PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:43:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack?
>
> Sure. Although I'm still somewhat puzzled by the duplicated effort of
> __BITS_PER_LONG and BITS
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:43:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack?
Sure. Although I'm still somewhat puzzled by the duplicated effort of
__BITS_PER_LONG and BITS_PER_LONG.
> commit a08cc3e6f7bb965672a3ff60f98d0dbbc5334ee7
> Author: Peter
Em Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:24:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:09:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:22:43AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
