On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 12:00 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> This documents autofs from the perspective of what the module actually
> supports rather than how automount is expected to use it.
> It is based mostly on code review and very little on testing so it
> may be inaccurate in some places.
>
> T
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:37:14 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/28/14 19:00, NeilBrown wrote:
> > +Directories further down the tree depend on the *max_proto* mount
>
> max_proto or maxproto?
> or either?
> check/fix other places also.
The m
On 07/28/14 19:00, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>
> This documents autofs from the perspective of what the module actually
> supports rather than how automount is expected to use it.
> It is based mostly on code review and very little on testing so it
> may be inaccurate in some places.
>
> The document a
This documents autofs from the perspective of what the module actually
supports rather than how automount is expected to use it.
It is based mostly on code review and very little on testing so it
may be inaccurate in some places.
The document assumes the functionality added by the RCU-walk patch
4 matches
Mail list logo
