Re: [PATCH/RFC] implement __attribute_discard_text/data__ and use it to leave out PM functions if !CONFIG_PM

Hi! > This patch is the result from the following discussion. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/16475 > > The problem is that CONFIG_PM affects a lot of low level drivers and > scattering CONFIG_PM all over the place is too ugly. This patch... > > * implements

Re: [PATCH/RFC] implement __attribute_discard_text/data__ and use it to leave out PM functions if !CONFIG_PM

Hi! This patch is the result from the following discussion. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/16475 The problem is that CONFIG_PM affects a lot of low level drivers and scattering CONFIG_PM all over the place is too ugly. This patch... * implements __attribute_discard_text__

[PATCH/RFC] implement __attribute_discard_text/data__ and use it to leave out PM functions if !CONFIG_PM

Hello, all. This patch is the result from the following discussion. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/16475 The problem is that CONFIG_PM affects a lot of low level drivers and scattering CONFIG_PM all over the place is too ugly. This patch... * implements __attribute_discard_text__

[PATCH/RFC] implement __attribute_discard_text/data__ and use it to leave out PM functions if !CONFIG_PM

Hello, all. This patch is the result from the following discussion. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/16475 The problem is that CONFIG_PM affects a lot of low level drivers and scattering CONFIG_PM all over the place is too ugly. This patch... * implements __attribute_discard_text__