Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:56:01AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > I've kind of lost the plot here. How does this patch fit in with the > previous series of patches you posted? Does it replace them or go on > top of them? It's a cleanup ontop of the actual fix. - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

No problem. Will resend the full patch set for 2.6.21. Thanks Nam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18.01.2007 13:56:01: > I've kind of lost the plot here. How does this patch fit in with the > previous series of patches you posted? Does it replace them or go on > top of them? > > Can please you

Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

I've kind of lost the plot here. How does this patch fit in with the previous series of patches you posted? Does it replace them or go on top of them? Can please you resend me the full series of patch that remove the use of do_mmap(), with all cleanups and bug fixes included? And please roll

Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

I've kind of lost the plot here. How does this patch fit in with the previous series of patches you posted? Does it replace them or go on top of them? Can please you resend me the full series of patch that remove the use of do_mmap(), with all cleanups and bug fixes included? And please roll

Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

No problem. Will resend the full patch set for 2.6.21. Thanks Nam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18.01.2007 13:56:01: I've kind of lost the plot here. How does this patch fit in with the previous series of patches you posted? Does it replace them or go on top of them? Can please you resend me

Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:56:01AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: I've kind of lost the plot here. How does this patch fit in with the previous series of patches you posted? Does it replace them or go on top of them? It's a cleanup ontop of the actual fix. - To unsubscribe from this list: send

[PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

Hello, here is a patch for ehca_uverbs.c with the following changes: - Rename mm_open/close() to ehca_mm_open/close() respectively - Refactor ehca_mmap() into sub-functions ehca_mmap_cq/qp(), which then call the new common sub-functions ehca_mmap_fw() and ehca_mmap_queue() to register firmware

[PATCH/RFC 2.6.21] ehca: ehca_uverbs.c: refactor ehca_mmap() for better readability

Hello, here is a patch for ehca_uverbs.c with the following changes: - Rename mm_open/close() to ehca_mm_open/close() respectively - Refactor ehca_mmap() into sub-functions ehca_mmap_cq/qp(), which then call the new common sub-functions ehca_mmap_fw() and ehca_mmap_queue() to register firmware