Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] DMA: shdma: add DT support

2013-04-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 15 April 2013 23:34:57 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > > This patch is missing the DT binding document, which is necessary for a > > proper > > review, and as a documentation for anyone trying to write device tree source > > files. > > The documentation was left off consciously,

Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] DMA: shdma: add DT support

2013-04-15 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Arnd Thanks for the review. On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 15 April 2013, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > This patch adds Device Tree support to the shdma driver. No special DT > > > properties are used,

Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] DMA: shdma: add DT support

2013-04-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 15 April 2013, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > This patch adds Device Tree support to the shdma driver. No special DT > > properties are used, only standard DMA DT bindings are implemented. Since > > shdma controllers reside o

Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] DMA: shdma: add DT support

2013-04-15 Thread Vinod Koul
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > This patch adds Device Tree support to the shdma driver. No special DT > properties are used, only standard DMA DT bindings are implemented. Since > shdma controllers reside on SoCs, their configuration is SoC-specific and > s

[PATCH/RFC 3/6] DMA: shdma: add DT support

2013-04-10 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
This patch adds Device Tree support to the shdma driver. No special DT properties are used, only standard DMA DT bindings are implemented. Since shdma controllers reside on SoCs, their configuration is SoC-specific and shall be passed to the driver from the SoC platform data, using the auxdata proc