On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:45:48AM +0200, Luca Montecchiani wrote:
> > I think I prefer the current version over your patched version.
> > But will probably change my mind when many people complain.
>
> Why have *fdisk or lilo trouble ?
I don't know whether lilo has trouble. But if it has
that
Andries Brouwer wrote:
:
Thanks for your exhaustive explanation as usual.
> I think I prefer the current version over your patched version.
> But will probably change my mind when many people complain.
Why have different behavior ?
Why have *fdisk or lilo trouble ?
I still didn't see the gain
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:42:42AM +0200, Luca Montecchiani wrote:
> few ours ago I discover that my kernel 2.4.0-test8pre5 was unable to
> correctly identify the geometry of my second ide HD (*),
Always remember: a disk does not have a geometry.
> this is very bad
Why precisely?
> and fdisk
Hi,
few ours ago I discover that my kernel 2.4.0-test8pre5 was unable to
correctly identify the geometry of my second ide HD (*), this is very
bad and fdisk come out with a lot of warnings, see:
Disk /dev/hdc: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 6296 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes
Device
4 matches
Mail list logo