Mikael Starvik writes:
> Another comment:
>
> >CFLAGS += -ffreestanding to avoid gcc magically turning sprintf()
> > into calls to non-existent strcpy().
>
> You could use -fno-builtin-sprintf instead and thus also avoid the abs
> change.
Cool. I'll test that and if it works w/o exposing
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 9:50 AM
To: 'Mikael Pettersson'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
Subject: RE: [PATCH][2.4.30-pre1] preliminary fixes for gcc-4.0
>+#if __GNUC__ > 2 || (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR >= 96)
Should be __GNUC_MINOR__
-O
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:11 +0100, Mikael Starvik wrote:
>>+#if __GNUC__ > 2 || (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR >= 96)
>
>Should be __GNUC_MINOR__
Thanks, I'll fix that.
/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t: [PATCH][2.4.30-pre1] preliminary fixes for gcc-4.0
Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386 (multiple
boxes), x86-64, and ppc32.
The change
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:28:58PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
> > to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
> > are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:28:58PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
> to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
> are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386 (multiple
> boxes), x86-64, and
Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386 (multiple
boxes), x86-64, and ppc32.
The changes fall into these categories:
- static-vs-non-static mism
7 matches
Mail list logo