Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Tuesday, 8 of March 2005 13:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: ]-- snip --[ > > > Now, akpm sent all (?) swsusp updates to Linus, so it should appear in > > > bk tree later today. If you could regenerate the patches (1/3 will no > > > longer be needed) and send them to me & l-k. I'll then forwar

Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Tuesday, 8 of March 2005 12:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > [-- snip --] > > Just bad timing, I guess. I sent wrong patches, and andrew reacted by > > simply waiting for me to catch up with right tree (which is okay, it > > was big and not critical). > > > > Now, akpm sent all (?) s

Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Tuesday, 8 of March 2005 11:38, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Po 07-03-05 13:13:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 7 of March 2005 12:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, the Signed-off-by line was missing from the original p

Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-08 Thread Pavel Machek
On Po 07-03-05 13:13:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 7 of March 2005 12:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, the Signed-off-by line was missing from the original patch. Andrew, > > > should I resubmit it? > > > > > > > I dropped l

Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 7 of March 2005 12:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Monday, 7 of March 2005 07:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:51:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Hu Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-07 Thread Andrew Morton
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday, 7 of March 2005 07:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:51:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Hu Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Subject: swsusp: use non-contiguous memory on resume - ppc suppor

Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 7 of March 2005 07:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:51:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Hu Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Subject: swsusp: use non-contiguous memory on resume - ppc support > > > > This patch contains the architecture-dependent c

Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

2005-03-06 Thread hugang
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:51:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Hu Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: swsusp: use non-contiguous memory on resume - ppc support > > This patch contains the architecture-dependent changes for ppc > required for using a linklist instead of an array of p