Re: [PATCH][UPDATE] i2c: Add support for virtual I2C adapters

Is there a reason why the files and config options have been renamed from i2c-virtual to i2c-virt? On 4/7/06, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any comments or acceptance of this patch? - k On Mar 30, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Virtual adapters are useful to handle multiplexed

Re: [PATCH][UPDATE] i2c: Add support for virtual I2C adapters

Is there a reason why the files and config options have been renamed from i2c-virtual to i2c-virt? On 4/7/06, Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any comments or acceptance of this patch? - k On Mar 30, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: Virtual adapters are useful to handle multiplexed