On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:44:45 +
Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 13/12/17 20:38, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:30:04 +
> > Colin Ian King wrote:
> >
> >> On 13/12/17 20:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +
> >>> Colin King wrote:
> >>>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:38:44 +0100
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:30:04 +
> Colin Ian King wrote:
>
> > On 13/12/17 20:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +
> > > Colin King wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Colin Ian King
> > >>
> > >> The ch
On 13/12/17 20:38, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:30:04 +
> Colin Ian King wrote:
>
>> On 13/12/17 20:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +
>>> Colin King wrote:
>>>
From: Colin Ian King
The check of len being zero is redundant
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:30:04 +
Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 13/12/17 20:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +
> > Colin King wrote:
> >
> >> From: Colin Ian King
> >>
> >> The check of len being zero is redundant as it has already been
> >> sanity checked for th
On 13/12/17 20:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +
> Colin King wrote:
>
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The check of len being zero is redundant as it has already been
>> sanity checked for this value at the start of the function. Hence
>> it is impossible for this tes
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +
Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The check of len being zero is redundant as it has already been
> sanity checked for this value at the start of the function. Hence
> it is impossible for this test to be true and so the redundant
> code can be remo
From: Colin Ian King
The check of len being zero is redundant as it has already been
sanity checked for this value at the start of the function. Hence
it is impossible for this test to be true and so the redundant
code can be removed.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462748 ("Logically dead code")
7 matches
Mail list logo