On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 11:06:36PM +, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The non-null check on udata is redundant as this check was performed
> just a few statements earlier and the check is always true as udata
> must be non-null at this point. Remove redundant the check on udata
>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:23:28AM +, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 04/03/2019 06:36, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 11:06:36PM +, Colin King wrote:
> >> From: Colin Ian King
> >>
> >> The non-null check on udata is redundant as this check was performed
> >> just a few sta
On 04/03/2019 06:36, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 11:06:36PM +, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The non-null check on udata is redundant as this check was performed
>> just a few statements earlier and the check is always true as udata
>> must be non-null at
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 11:06:36PM +, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The non-null check on udata is redundant as this check was performed
> just a few statements earlier and the check is always true as udata
> must be non-null at this point. Remove redundant the check on udata
>
From: Colin Ian King
The non-null check on udata is redundant as this check was performed
just a few statements earlier and the check is always true as udata
must be non-null at this point. Remove redundant the check on udata
and the redundant else part that can never be executed.
Detected by Co
5 matches
Mail list logo