On 10/11/2020 18:38, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:34:05PM +, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> On 10/11/2020 15:24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 11:57:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On 2020-11-09 8:07 p.m., Qian Cai wrote:
> On Mon,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:34:05PM +, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 10/11/2020 15:24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 11:57:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2020-11-09 8:07 p.m., Qian Cai wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 13:04 +, Colin King wrote:
>
On 10/11/2020 15:24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 11:57:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2020-11-09 8:07 p.m., Qian Cai wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 13:04 +, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
Currently the allocation of cpulist is
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 11:57:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-11-09 8:07 p.m., Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 13:04 +, Colin King wrote:
> > > From: Colin Ian King
> > >
> > > Currently the allocation of cpulist is based on the length of buf but does
> > > not
On 2020-11-09 8:07 p.m., Qian Cai wrote:
On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 13:04 +, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
Currently the allocation of cpulist is based on the length of buf but does
not include the addition end of string '\0' terminator. Static analysis is
reporting this as a
On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 13:04 +, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Currently the allocation of cpulist is based on the length of buf but does
> not include the addition end of string '\0' terminator. Static analysis is
> reporting this as a potential out-of-bounds access on cpulist.
From: Colin Ian King
Currently the allocation of cpulist is based on the length of buf but does
not include the addition end of string '\0' terminator. Static analysis is
reporting this as a potential out-of-bounds access on cpulist. Fix this by
allocating enough space for the additional '\0'
7 matches
Mail list logo