On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 3:02 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 02:02:18PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:21 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:51:48PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:2
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 02:02:18PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:21 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:51:48PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM Colin King
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Colin Ian King
> >
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:21 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:51:48PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM Colin King
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Colin Ian King
> > >
> > > The null check on a failed workqueue create is currently null checki
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:51:48PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM Colin King wrote:
> >
> > From: Colin Ian King
> >
> > The null check on a failed workqueue create is currently null checking
> > hdev->cq_wq rather than the pointer hdev->cq_wq[i] and so the test
> >
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM Colin King wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The null check on a failed workqueue create is currently null checking
> hdev->cq_wq rather than the pointer hdev->cq_wq[i] and so the test
> will never be true on a failed workqueue create. Fix this by checking
> hde
From: Colin Ian King
The null check on a failed workqueue create is currently null checking
hdev->cq_wq rather than the pointer hdev->cq_wq[i] and so the test
will never be true on a failed workqueue create. Fix this by checking
hdev->cq_wq[i].
Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference before null check
6 matches
Mail list logo