On 6/25/19 9:48 AM, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.06.2019 23:58, schrieb Colin King:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> There is a potential integer overflow when int 2 is left shifted
>> as this is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic but is being used in
>> a context that expects an expression of ty
Am 24.06.2019 23:58, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> There is a potential integer overflow when int 2 is left shifted
> as this is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic but is being used in
> a context that expects an expression of type s64. Fix this by
> shifting 2ULL to avoid a 3
From: Colin Ian King
There is a potential integer overflow when int 2 is left shifted
as this is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic but is being used in
a context that expects an expression of type s64. Fix this by
shifting 2ULL to avoid a 32 bit overflow.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional int
3 matches
Mail list logo
