On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 12:26:49PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Colin
>
> On 10/2/20 11:54 AM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King
> >
> > Currently the comparisons of u16 integers value and sopass_val with
> > less than zero for error checking is always false because the values
> > are
From: Colin King
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:54:22 +0100
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Currently the comparisons of u16 integers value and sopass_val with
> less than zero for error checking is always false because the values
> are unsigned. Fix this by making these variables int. This does not
>
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 12:26:49PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Colin
>
> On 10/2/20 11:54 AM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King
> >
> > Currently the comparisons of u16 integers value and sopass_val with
> > less than zero for error checking is always false because the values
> > are
Colin
On 10/2/20 11:54 AM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
Currently the comparisons of u16 integers value and sopass_val with
less than zero for error checking is always false because the values
are unsigned. Fix this by making these variables int. This does not
affect the shift and
From: Colin Ian King
Currently the comparisons of u16 integers value and sopass_val with
less than zero for error checking is always false because the values
are unsigned. Fix this by making these variables int. This does not
affect the shift and mask operations performed on these variables
5 matches
Mail list logo