Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-03-18 Thread Michael Tretter
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:48:06 +, Colin Ian King wrote: > On 11/02/2021 19:05, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Michael Tretter (2021-02-10 23:39:06) > >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:28:18 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> Quoting Colin King (2021-02-10 10:49:38) > From: Colin Ian King > > >>

Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-03-18 Thread Colin Ian King
On 11/02/2021 19:05, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Michael Tretter (2021-02-10 23:39:06) >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:28:18 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Quoting Colin King (2021-02-10 10:49:38) From: Colin Ian King The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by >>

Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-02-11 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Michael Tretter (2021-02-10 23:39:06) > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:28:18 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Colin King (2021-02-10 10:49:38) > > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > > > The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by > > > a return, hence the subsequent null

Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-02-11 Thread Colin Ian King
On 11/02/2021 07:31, Michael Tretter wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:49:38 +, Colin King wrote: >> From: Colin Ian King >> >> The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by >> a return, hence the subsequent null check is redundant deadcode >> that can be removed. Clean up

Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-02-10 Thread Michael Tretter
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:28:18 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Colin King (2021-02-10 10:49:38) > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by > > a return, hence the subsequent null check is redundant deadcode > > that can be removed. Clea

Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-02-10 Thread Michael Tretter
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:49:38 +, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by > a return, hence the subsequent null check is redundant deadcode > that can be removed. Clean up the code and remove it. > > Fixes: 9c789deea206 (

Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-02-10 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Colin King (2021-02-10 10:49:38) > From: Colin Ian King > > The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by > a return, hence the subsequent null check is redundant deadcode > that can be removed. Clean up the code and remove it. > > Fixes: 9c789deea206 ("soc: xilinx:

[PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check

2021-02-10 Thread Colin King
From: Colin Ian King The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by a return, hence the subsequent null check is redundant deadcode that can be removed. Clean up the code and remove it. Fixes: 9c789deea206 ("soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider for output clocks") Sig