On 28/07/07, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 23:27 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to
> > alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run
> > the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it doe
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 23:27 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to
> alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run
> the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far
> better to test if we got NULL back and in that ca
Hello,
In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to
alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run
the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far
better to test if we got NULL back and in that case return -ENOMEM
just as we already do for the other
3 matches
Mail list logo
