On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 03:41:52 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> >> Not sure how that could happen.
> >>
> >> If it would really happen, we could set dev->match_driver to 0 in
> >> pci_stop_dev.
> >
> > Simply, run "modprobe -r driver
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Not sure how that could happen.
>>
>> If it would really happen, we could set dev->match_driver to 0 in
>> pci_stop_dev.
>
> Simply, run "modprobe -r driver && modprobe driver" in a loop and
> remove the PCI host bridge the given
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
Not sure how that could happen.
If it would really happen, we could set dev-match_driver to 0 in
pci_stop_dev.
Simply, run modprobe -r driver modprobe driver in a loop and
remove the PCI host bridge the given
On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 03:41:52 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
Not sure how that could happen.
If it would really happen, we could set dev-match_driver to 0 in
pci_stop_dev.
Simply, run modprobe -r driver
On Monday, January 06, 2014 11:28:43 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 02, 2014 02:47:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> No. It should be before removing all root bus devices.
> >> as they need to access the pci devices during
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 02, 2014 02:47:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> No. It should be before removing all root bus devices.
>> as they need to access the pci devices during stop ioapic and dmar.
>>
>> Also ioapic itself could one one pci
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 02:47:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
No. It should be before removing all root bus devices.
as they need to access the pci devices during stop ioapic and dmar.
Also ioapic itself could one one
On Monday, January 06, 2014 11:28:43 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 02:47:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
No. It should be before removing all root bus devices.
as they need to access the pci devices
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 02:47:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 10:45:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Monday, December 30, 2013
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 10:45:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
>> wrote:
>> > On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> > We have patches that need to
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 10:45:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
wrote:
On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
We have
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 02:47:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 10:45:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
wrote:
On Monday,
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 10:45:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > We have patches that need to stop ioapic and iommu between
> >> > pci_stop_root_bus and
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > We have patches that need to stop ioapic and iommu between
>> > pci_stop_root_bus and pci_remove_root_bus.
>
> BTW, what *exactly* do they need to be stopped between?
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
We have patches that need to stop ioapic and iommu between
pci_stop_root_bus and pci_remove_root_bus.
BTW, what *exactly* do they need to be stopped
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 10:45:46 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
We have patches that need to stop ioapic and iommu between
pci_stop_root_bus and
On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, December 29, 2013 07:30:18 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > The device_del(_bridge->dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
> > >
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 07:30:18 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > The device_del(_bridge->dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
> > problematic, because it causes all sysfs directories below
> > the host bridge to
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 07:30:18 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
The device_del(host_bridge-dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
problematic, because it causes all sysfs
On Monday, December 30, 2013 01:51:28 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 07:30:18 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
The
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The device_del(_bridge->dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
> problematic, because it causes all sysfs directories below
> the host bridge to be removed recursively and when
> pci_remove_root_bus() attempts to
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
The device_del(host_bridge-dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
problematic, because it causes all sysfs directories below
the host bridge to be removed recursively and
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:20:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The device_del(_bridge->dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
> problematic, because it causes all sysfs directories below
> the host bridge to be removed recursively and when
> pci_remove_root_bus()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The device_del(_bridge->dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
problematic, because it causes all sysfs directories below
the host bridge to be removed recursively and when
pci_remove_root_bus() attempts to remove devices on the root
bus (whose sysfs directories are gone now
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
The device_del(host_bridge-dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
problematic, because it causes all sysfs directories below
the host bridge to be removed recursively and when
pci_remove_root_bus() attempts to remove devices on the root
bus (whose sysfs
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:20:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
The device_del(host_bridge-dev) in pci_stop_root_bus() is
problematic, because it causes all sysfs directories below
the host bridge to be removed recursively and when
26 matches
Mail list logo
