On Wednesday 15 August 2007 08:03:24 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> This is not a real feature, more a fix.
> Without, PNP IO ports might not get considered. This mainly affects ACPI
> system board devices with HID PNP0C02 (at least I saw this on my and
> some other machines, but it may affect more..
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:03:24 +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> I saw recent Lindentation patches for pnp. I expect they came in after
> -rc2?
> This one is against 2.6.23-rc2 and might not patch with latest git
> repository changes then.
It applied fine on top of 2.6.23-rc3-git1.
I've
Hi Thomas,
On 8/15/07, Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +int pnp_port_alloc (struct pnp_resource_table *res)
> +{
> + int ret = 0, i;
> + if (res->allocated_ports == 0) {
> + res->port_resource = kmalloc(sizeof(struct resource)
> +
Hi,
This is not a real feature, more a fix.
Without, PNP IO ports might not get considered. This mainly affects ACPI
system board devices with HID PNP0C02 (at least I saw this on my and
some other machines, but it may affect more...).
I expect this got introduced when resources were not handled b
4 matches
Mail list logo
