> BTW. here is a patch I did a while back for minix. I know it isn't
> a big deal, but the work is done so I guess I should send it along.
Looks safe, although I'm surprised it actually gets around with such
little locking in general.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sunday 27 January 2008 13:17, Andi Kleen wrote:
> [Andrew: I believe this is -mm material for .25]
>
> - Convert some more file systems (generally those who don't use the BKL
> for anything except mount) to use unlocked_bkl.
> - Implement BKL less fasync (see patch for the rationale)
> This is
On Sunday 27 January 2008 13:17, Andi Kleen wrote:
[Andrew: I believe this is -mm material for .25]
- Convert some more file systems (generally those who don't use the BKL
for anything except mount) to use unlocked_bkl.
- Implement BKL less fasync (see patch for the rationale)
This is
BTW. here is a patch I did a while back for minix. I know it isn't
a big deal, but the work is done so I guess I should send it along.
Looks safe, although I'm surprised it actually gets around with such
little locking in general.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
[Andrew: I believe this is -mm material for .25]
- Convert some more file systems (generally those who don't use the BKL
for anything except mount) to use unlocked_bkl.
- Implement BKL less fasync (see patch for the rationale)
This is currently a separate entry point, but since the number of
[Andrew: I believe this is -mm material for .25]
- Convert some more file systems (generally those who don't use the BKL
for anything except mount) to use unlocked_bkl.
- Implement BKL less fasync (see patch for the rationale)
This is currently a separate entry point, but since the number of
6 matches
Mail list logo