Re: [PATCH] [19/20] x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks

On Thursday 03 January 2008 11:56:14 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks > > hm, why? It's pretty well-established that we print addresses 8 char > wide on 32-bit. It's useless. What purpose does it have?

Re: [PATCH] [19/20] x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks

* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks hm, why? It's pretty well-established that we print addresses 8 char wide on 32-bit. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: [PATCH] [19/20] x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks

* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks hm, why? It's pretty well-established that we print addresses 8 char wide on 32-bit. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH] [19/20] x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks

On Thursday 03 January 2008 11:56:14 Ingo Molnar wrote: * Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks hm, why? It's pretty well-established that we print addresses 8 char wide on 32-bit. It's useless. What purpose does it have? -Andi -- To

[PATCH] [19/20] x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c === --- linux.orig/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c +++

[PATCH] [19/20] x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c === --- linux.orig/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c +++