On Aug 13 2007 14:08, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
>> Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
>> So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
>> and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split them
>> up at all. The
Am Montag 13 August 2007 09:18 schrieb Al Viro:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:46:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
> > >
> > > So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
>
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
> Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
> So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
> and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split them
> up at all. The fact that the split up landed you at 300+ patches
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 00:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> The posting limit is 400K for linux-kernel, netdev, and one
> or two of the other lists.
Apologies. Posted it twice over 2 days.
Anyway, I supposed you could kill the spool entries if you want.
cheers, Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this
From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:46:49 -0700
> I tried to send 1 patch over the last couple of days.
> Unfortunately, it's > 100KB and disappears into the void.
The posting limit is 400K for linux-kernel, netdev, and one
or two of the other lists.
-
To unsubscribe
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:46:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
> >
> > So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
> > and for these patches in particular there are few
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
>
> So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
> and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split
> them up at all. The fact that the split up landed you at
Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split
them up at all. The fact that the split up landed you at 300+ patches
is a very good indication of that.
-
To unsubscribe
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f6b84d2..7f5b7c2 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3599,6 +3599,7 @@ P:Don Fry
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S:
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f6b84d2..7f5b7c2 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3599,6 +3599,7 @@ P:Don Fry
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S:
Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split
them up at all. The fact that the split up landed you at 300+ patches
is a very good indication of that.
-
To unsubscribe
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:
Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split
them up at all. The fact that the split up landed you at 300+
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 00:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
The posting limit is 400K for linux-kernel, netdev, and one
or two of the other lists.
Apologies. Posted it twice over 2 days.
Anyway, I supposed you could kill the spool entries if you want.
cheers, Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:46:49 -0700
I tried to send 1 patch over the last couple of days.
Unfortunately, it's 100KB and disappears into the void.
The posting limit is 400K for linux-kernel, netdev, and one
or two of the other lists.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:46:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:
Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split them
up at all. The fact that the split up landed you at 300+ patches is a
Am Montag 13 August 2007 09:18 schrieb Al Viro:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:46:49PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:
Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
and for
On Aug 13 2007 14:08, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources,
and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split them
up at all. The fact that the
18 matches
Mail list logo
