On Sunday 22 July 2007 00:16, Oleg Verych wrote:
> * From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:54:53 +0200 (CEST)
> >
> > Jan asked to always use the builtin memcpy on gcc 4.3 mainline because
> > it should generate better code than the old macro. Let's try it.
>
> Unfortu
On Sunday 22 July 2007 01:16:42 Oleg Verych wrote:
> * From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:54:53 +0200 (CEST)
> >
> > Jan asked to always use the builtin memcpy on gcc 4.3 mainline because
> > it should generate better code than the old macro. Let's try it.
>
> Unfor
* From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:54:53 +0200 (CEST)
>
> Jan asked to always use the builtin memcpy on gcc 4.3 mainline because
> it should generate better code than the old macro. Let's try it.
Unfortunately such info is hard to find. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is
Jan asked to always use the builtin memcpy on gcc 4.3 mainline because
it should generate better code than the old macro. Let's try it.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-x86_64/string.h |5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(
4 matches
Mail list logo