On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 09:29 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 03:38:23 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton writes:
> > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:52:47AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:29:18AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 03:38:23 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > Andrew Morton wri
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:29:18AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 03:38:23 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton writes:
> > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
> wrote
On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 03:38:23 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Andrew Morton writes:
> > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
wrote:
> > >> audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were fai
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
> > wrote:
> >> audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing with
> >> EINVAL.
>
> The only case where this appears to make
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:02:43AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Richard Guy Briggs writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> @@ -377,6 +383,12 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_rule_to_entry(struct
> >> audit_rule *rule)
> >>if
Richard Guy Briggs writes:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> @@ -377,6 +383,12 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_rule_to_entry(struct
>> audit_rule *rule)
>> if (!gid_valid(f->gid))
>> goto exit_free;
>>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:20:18PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:16:22PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Steve Grubb writes:
> > > On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:39:32 AM Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >> Andrew Morton writes:
> > >> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:16:22PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Steve Grubb writes:
>
> > On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:39:32 AM Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Andrew Morton writes:
> >> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
> > wrote:
> >> >> audit rule additions contain
Steve Grubb writes:
> On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:39:32 AM Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Andrew Morton writes:
>> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
> wrote:
>> >> audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing with
>> >> EINVAL.
>> >>
>> >> UID_INVALI
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:39:32 AM Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
wrote:
> >> audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing with
> >> EINVAL.
> >>
> >> UID_INVALID (and GID_INVALID) is actually
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:39:32AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs
> > wrote:
> >> audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing with
> >> EINVAL.
> >>
> >> UID_INVALID (and GID_INVALID) is a
Andrew Morton writes:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>
>> audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing with
>> EINVAL.
>>
>> UID_INVALID (and GID_INVALID) is actually a valid uid (gid) for setting and
>> testing against audit rules. Remove
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:18:17 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing with
> EINVAL.
>
> UID_INVALID (and GID_INVALID) is actually a valid uid (gid) for setting and
> testing against audit rules. Remove the check for invalid uid and g
audit rule additions containing "-F auid!=4294967295" were failing with EINVAL.
UID_INVALID (and GID_INVALID) is actually a valid uid (gid) for setting and
testing against audit rules. Remove the check for invalid uid and gid when
parsing rules and data for logging.
Revert part of ca57ec0f00c3f1
15 matches
Mail list logo