On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:20:34AM +0800, rae l wrote:
>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch applied. Thanks a lot Denis!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://go
On Nov 29, 2007 7:13 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > uninlining this function shrinks crypto/tcrypt.o's .text from 20,009 bytes
> > down to 19,701.
> >
> > inlining is almost always wrong.
>
> I agree. Please do as Andrew suggests and resubmit.
inline disabled.
Cc: Randy Dunlap
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 01:26:22AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:03:29 +0800 "rae l" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -static void hexdump(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
> > +static inline void hexdump(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
> > {
> > - while (len--)
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:03:29 +0800 "rae l" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -static void hexdump(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
> +static inline void hexdump(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
> {
> - while (len--)
> - printk("%02x", *buf++);
> -
> - printk("\n");
> +
On Nov 27, 2007 10:58 AM, Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > + print_hex_dump(KERN_CONT, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
> > + 16, 1,
> > + buf, len, 0);
> >
> Not important, but why use '0' instead of 'false'?
after read http://lkml.org/lkml/200
Denis Cheng wrote:
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
this is against the lastest cryptodev tree.
crypto/tcrypt.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c
index 1e12b86
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
this is against the lastest cryptodev tree.
crypto/tcrypt.c |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c
index 1e12b86..ae762c2 100644
---
7 matches
Mail list logo