Re: [PATCH] [RFC] regmap: Add no-"bus" configuration possibility

2012-11-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 05:18:17PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: Sorry about the delay - like I say the patch was unfortunately sent during ELC-E. > This patch adds two callbacks to the 'regmap' configuration which user > is expected to set with their implementation of read and write > functionali

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] regmap: Add no-"bus" configuration possibility

2012-11-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:37:20PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > On 11/03/2012 05:18 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > This commit has only purpose of illustrating the proposed extension of > > the 'regmap' API. It has never been compiled or tested. > Mark, did you by any chance had a time to look a

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] regmap: Add no-"bus" configuration possibility

2012-11-13 Thread Andrey Smirnov
On 11/03/2012 05:18 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > This patch proposes extension to the API that was suggested by Mark in > the following thread: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1383734 > > The idea behind extensions is to allow the devices that expose some > register-like interface but

[PATCH] [RFC] regmap: Add no-"bus" configuration possibility

2012-11-03 Thread Andrey Smirnov
This patch proposes extension to the API that was suggested by Mark in the following thread: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1383734 The idea behind extensions is to allow the devices that expose some register-like interface but whose protocol for reading or writing those registers cou