On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Sergey Yanovich wrote:
> First, I tried to replace 'mdelay' with 'msleep' and put it after
> 'unlock'. It gives a certain oops.
>
> With the delay of 50 msec driver remains stable. It has something
> to do with hardware initialization, so this value should not be
> aff
First, I tried to replace 'mdelay' with 'msleep' and put it after
'unlock'. It gives a certain oops.
With the delay of 50 msec driver remains stable. It has something
to do with hardware initialization, so this value should not be
affected by CPU speed. I hope so.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Yanovich <
First, I tried to replace 'mdelay' with 'msleep' and put it after
'unlock'. It gives a certain oops.
With the delay of 50 msec driver remains stable. It has something
to do with hardware initialization, so this value should not be
affected by CPU speed. I hope so.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Yanovich <
First, I tried to replace 'mdelay' with 'msleep' and put it after
'unlock'. It gives a certain oops.
With the delay of 50 msec driver remains stable. It has something
to do with hardware initialization, so this value should not be
affected by CPU speed. I hope so.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Yanovich <
4 matches
Mail list logo
