On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:33 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 July 2007 02:21:14 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:49 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Monday 16 July 2007 08:21:07 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > > PNP0C02 devices normally have a lot more IO po
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 02:21:14 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:49 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Monday 16 July 2007 08:21:07 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > PNP0C02 devices normally have a lot more IO port declarations than
> > > currently defined in PNP_MAX_PORT
> >
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:49 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2007 08:21:07 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > PNP0C02 devices normally have a lot more IO port declarations than
> > currently defined in PNP_MAX_PORT
>
> Yes.
>
> > I also wonder whether other limits like:
> > #define PN
On Monday 16 July 2007 08:21:07 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> PNP0C02 devices normally have a lot more IO port declarations than
> currently defined in PNP_MAX_PORT
Yes.
> I also wonder whether other limits like:
> #define PNP_MAX_MEM4
> #define PNP_MAX_IRQ2
> #define PNP_MAX_DM
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:21:07 +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> PNP0C02 devices normally have a lot more IO port declarations than
> currently defined in PNP_MAX_PORT
>
> For checking, have a look at your disassembled DSDT, and look out for
> the _CRS function (and/or a ResourceTemplate
PNP0C02 devices normally have a lot more IO port declarations than
currently defined in PNP_MAX_PORT
For checking, have a look at your disassembled DSDT, and look out for
the _CRS function (and/or a ResourceTemplate often called CRS).
Here an example:
IO (Decode16,0x0010, // Range Mi
6 matches
Mail list logo