Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:26:04PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > The code in there is irksome - it'd be nice to find some way of
> > restructuring it to make it less obscure, and to kill that warning.
>
> Functionscope or filescope? ;)
Oh well... I think the latter. I wil clean it up an
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:45:40AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:48:05AM +0100, roland wrote:
> > > fs/block_dev.c: In function `bd_claim_by_kobject':
> > > fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: `found' might be used uninitialized in this
> > > function
> >
> > found actu
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:56:08 +0100 Johannes Weiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:48:05AM +0100, roland wrote:
> > fs/block_dev.c: In function `bd_claim_by_kobject':
> > fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: `found' might be used uninitialized in this
> > function
>
> found actua
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:48:05AM +0100, roland wrote:
> fs/block_dev.c: In function `bd_claim_by_kobject':
> fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: `found' might be used uninitialized in this
> function
found actually _is_ used uninitialized if the call to bd_claim() returns
anything but 0. Thank y
Hello !
the attached patch should fix the following compile warning:
fs/block_dev.c: In function `bd_claim_by_kobject':
fs/block_dev.c:953: warning: `found' might be used uninitialized in this
function
i`m an absolutely awful programmer , but feel free to comment, ignore or
merge.
reg
5 matches
Mail list logo