On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 07:15:05PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > I strongly disrecommend increasing NPROTO. Maybe we should look into
> > reusing NETLINK_FIREWALL (which was an old 2.2.x kernel interface).
>
> ip_queue.c still uses NETLINK_FIREWALL so we really can't use
> that.
sorry, I d
;
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:14:55 +0400
> Andrew has no objection against connector and it lives in -mm
A patch sitting in -mm has zero significance. A lot of junk
and useless things end up there as often Andrew incorporates
just about every single patch
From: Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 09:33:53 -0400
> I strongly disrecommend increasing NPROTO. Maybe we should look into
> reusing NETLINK_FIREWALL (which was an old 2.2.x kernel interface).
ip_queue.c still uses NETLINK_FIREWALL so we really can't use
that.
So instea
From: Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 09:33:53 -0400
> I strongly disrecommend increasing NPROTO. Maybe we should look into
> reusing NETLINK_FIREWALL (which was an old 2.2.x kernel interface).
That is how I will fix this 1-wire case, by reusing the NETLINK_FIREWALL
thing
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 08:54:27AM -0400, Harald Welte ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Hi Evgeniy,
>
> the following patch fixes the illegal use of NETLINK_NFLOG by the
> 1wire drivers. It assumes that the netlink tap families can now safely
> be reclaimed, which is the case according to
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:05:59PM -0400, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:54:27 -0400), Harald
> Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/netlink.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
> > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> > #define NETLIN
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:54:27 -0400), Harald
Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> --- a/include/linux/netlink.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> #define NETLINK_IP6_FW 13
> #define NETLINK_DNRTMSG 14 /* DECnet rout
Hi Dave,
Hi Evgeniy,
the following patch fixes the illegal use of NETLINK_NFLOG by the
1wire drivers. It assumes that the netlink tap families can now safely
be reclaimed, which is the case according to Dave at netconf'05.
I'm not sure who would be the right person to fix this, but this patch
ne
9 matches
Mail list logo
