On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:07:38 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, I don't have any idea of what is a "reasonable amount".
> Guess I could look at non-movable zone memory usage in a system at
> typical or peak load to get an idea. Anyone have any data in this
> regard?
>
On (02/08/07 17:14), Mel Gorman didst pronounce:
> On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
> > Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> > > when ZONE_MOVABLE is
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
> >
>
> It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 09:44 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
> >
>
> It's case-by-case I think. In zone order
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 09:44 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE
On (02/08/07 17:14), Mel Gorman didst pronounce:
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:07:38 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, I don't have any idea of what is a reasonable amount.
Guess I could look at non-movable zone memory usage in a system at
typical or peak load to get an idea. Anyone have any data in this
regard?
I'm
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
>
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE case,
user's page cache will not use ZONE_NORMAL until
Fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl config
Against 2.6.23-rc1-mm1.
Found this testing Mel Gorman's patch for the issue with
"policy_zone" and ZONE_MOVABLE.
Misplaced #endif is hiding the numa_zonelist_order sysctl
when !SECURITY.
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
Fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl config
Against 2.6.23-rc1-mm1.
Found this testing Mel Gorman's patch for the issue with
policy_zone and ZONE_MOVABLE.
Misplaced #endif is hiding the numa_zonelist_order sysctl
when !SECURITY.
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE case,
user's page cache will not use ZONE_NORMAL until
12 matches
Mail list logo
