On Thursday 04 December 2014 17:49:40 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2014 17:49:40 Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
>> >
>> > wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2014 17:49:40 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár
>> >
>> > wrote:
>>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 06:33:08PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > There is no "/serial-number" property in kernel:
> >
> > $ ls -l -a /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/
> > drwxr-xr-x3 000 Jan 1 00:00 .
> > drwxr-xr-x 18 0
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 06:33:08PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no /serial-number property in kernel:
$ ls -l -a /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/
drwxr-xr-x3 000 Jan 1 00:00 .
drwxr-xr-x
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali
On Thursday 04 December 2014 17:49:40 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2014 17:49:40 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM,
On Thursday 04 December 2014 17:49:40 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014
On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali
On Thursday 04 December 2014 01:33:08 Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014
On Saturday 06 September 2014 17:34:47 Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.09.2014 15:52, schrieb Pali Rohár:
> > On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
>
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:58:34 Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > So what is your suggestion for identifing board (name/type)
> > which will work with any kernel (and will not be broken
> > again by kernel later)?
>
> $ cat
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:58:16 Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 14:46:15 Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2014-09-05 13:13:16, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > - if (!mdesc)
> > > > + if
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 23:10:39 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be
> > done without breaking userspace - which is not
> > acceptable...
>
> I guess the fact is that the
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > Machine name from board description is some generic name
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 23:53:00 Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So how to read Revision and Serial number in DT based
> > kernel?
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/soc_id
> i.MX6SX
>
> $ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/revision
> 1.0
>
> $ cat
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 23:53:00 Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
So how to read Revision and Serial number in DT based
kernel?
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/soc_id
i.MX6SX
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/revision
1.0
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:46:19 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Machine name from board
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 23:10:39 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be
done without breaking userspace - which is not
acceptable...
I guess the fact is that the Nokia N900
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 14:46:15 Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2014-09-05 13:13:16, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
- if (!mdesc)
+ if (mdesc)
+
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:58:16 Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:58:34 Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
So what is your suggestion for identifing board (name/type)
which will work with any kernel (and will not be broken
again by kernel later)?
$ cat
On Saturday 06 September 2014 17:34:47 Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.09.2014 15:52, schrieb Pali Rohár:
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from
On Fri 2014-09-05 13:13:16, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > - if (!mdesc)
> > > + if (mdesc)
> > > + machine_name = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name();
> > > + else
> > >
On Fri 2014-09-05 13:13:16, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
- if (!mdesc)
+ if (mdesc)
+ machine_name = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name();
+ else
mdesc =
Am 05.09.2014 15:52, schrieb Pali Rohár:
> On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name
on DT
Am 05.09.2014 15:52, schrieb Pali Rohár:
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name
on DT kernel. DT provides
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> So what is your suggestion for identifing board (name/type) which
> will work with any kernel (and will not be broken again by kernel
> later)?
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine
Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Smart Device Board
--
To
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Machine name from board description is some
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Machine name from board description is some generic name
> > > on DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT
> > kernel. DT provides machine name property which is specific
> > for board, so use it instead generic one when
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT
> > kernel. DT provides machine name property which is specific
> > for board, so use it instead generic one when
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT
> kernel. DT provides machine name property which is specific
> for board, so use it instead generic one when possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
>
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT
kernel. DT provides machine name property which is specific
for board, so use it instead generic one when possible.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT
kernel. DT provides machine name property which is specific
for board, so use it instead generic one when possible.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT
kernel. DT provides machine name property which is specific
for board, so use it instead generic one when possible.
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name
on DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
So what is your suggestion for identifing board (name/type) which
will work with any kernel (and will not be broken again by kernel
later)?
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine
Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Smart Device
On Wed 2014-06-18 20:59:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Machine name from board
On Thu 2014-06-19 00:10:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be done
> > without breaking userspace - which is not acceptable...
>
> I guess the fact is that the Nokia N900
On Thu 2014-06-19 00:10:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be done
without breaking userspace - which is not acceptable...
I guess the fact is that the Nokia N900 proprietary
On Wed 2014-06-18 20:59:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is
On Wed 2014-06-18 20:59:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Machine name from board
On Wed 2014-06-18 20:59:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:27:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> > Also I still did not know why DT
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> > Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision
>> > number which is passed by bootloader
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> So how to read Revision and Serial number in DT based kernel?
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/soc_id
i.MX6SX
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/revision
1.0
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine
Freescale i.MX6 SoloX SDB Board
--
To
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision
> > number which is passed by bootloader via atags. Any idea?
>
> Probably because no one cared until now and
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be done
> without breaking userspace - which is not acceptable...
I guess the fact is that the Nokia N900 proprietary userspace has
never worked properly with the mainline
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
>> > Machine name from board description is some generic name on
>> > DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
>> >
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:00:54 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be
> > done without breaking userspace - which is not
> > acceptable...
> >
> > Also I still did not know
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be done
> without breaking userspace - which is not acceptable...
>
> Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision
> number which is passed by bootloader
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Machine name from board description is some generic name on
> > > DT kernel. DT provides machine
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > Machine name from board description is some generic name on
> > DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
> > specific for board, so use it instead generic one when
> >
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Machine name from board description is some generic name on
> > DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
> > specific for board, so use it instead
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT kernel.
> DT provides machine name property which is specific for board, so use
> it instead generic one when possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT kernel.
> DT provides machine name property which is specific for board, so use
> it instead generic one when possible.
Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT kernel.
DT provides machine name property which is specific for board, so use
it instead generic one when possible.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2
Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT kernel.
DT provides machine name property which is specific for board, so use
it instead generic one when possible.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |7 +--
1 file changed, 5
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT kernel.
DT provides machine name property which is specific for board, so use
it instead generic one when possible.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on DT kernel.
DT provides machine name property which is specific for board, so use
it instead generic one when possible.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on
DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
specific for board, so use it instead generic one
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on
DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
specific for board, so use it instead generic one
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on
DT kernel. DT provides machine name
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be done
without breaking userspace - which is not acceptable...
Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision
number which is passed by bootloader via
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:00:54 Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be
done without breaking userspace - which is not
acceptable...
Also I still did not know why DT
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:07:35 Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Machine name from board description is some generic name on
DT kernel. DT provides machine
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
So without this patch DT migration for Nokia N900 cannot be done
without breaking userspace - which is not acceptable...
I guess the fact is that the Nokia N900 proprietary userspace has
never worked properly with the mainline
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision
number which is passed by bootloader via atags. Any idea?
Probably because no one cared
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
So how to read Revision and Serial number in DT based kernel?
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/soc_id
i.MX6SX
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/revision
1.0
$ cat /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine
Freescale i.MX6 SoloX SDB
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision
number
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:27:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I
78 matches
Mail list logo