Re: [PATCH] ARM: Drop support for redundant "keepinitrd" boot-time param.

2007-09-20 Thread Michael Neuling
> NAK. "keepinitrd" is what people expect on ARM. > > I'm frustrated that whoever invented "retain_initrd" didn't look > around in the documentation to see if there was any existing > implementation first. The generic implementation should be fixed > IMHO, or at least the option string moved int

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Drop support for redundant "keepinitrd" boot-time param.

2007-09-20 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 12:06:44PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > Given the equivalent "retain_initrd" boot-time paramater, "keepinitrd" > appears to be entirely superfluous. NAK. "keepinitrd" is what people expect on ARM. I'm frustrated that whoever invented "retain_initrd" didn't look around

[PATCH] ARM: Drop support for redundant "keepinitrd" boot-time param.

2007-09-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Given the equivalent "retain_initrd" boot-time paramater, "keepinitrd" appears to be entirely superfluous. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- since this appears to be exactly the situation as with AVR32, it's an equivalent patch. there are no other situations like this i