Harmless mistake, but it's incorrect. The DT spec provides recommendations
for the node names:
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the
name should be one of the following choices:
...
interrupt-controller"

Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edwor...@renesas.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi
index 085bbd33eadc..3a17ab4e7c2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@
                                clocks = <&armclk>;
                        };
 
-                       gic: gic@1000 {
+                       gic: interrupt-controller@1000 {
                                compatible = "arm,arm11mp-gic";
                                interrupt-controller;
                                #interrupt-cells = <3>;
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to