On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:40:08AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:40:17 +
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:03:45PM +0100, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > > +static inline bool arch_syscall_match_sym_name(const char *sym,
> > > +
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:40:08 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Is this really safe? What guarantees that we can wind forward four
> > bytes here? If it's always safe, it needs a better comment than just
> > two words.
>
> I believe it is, but a comment would do well.
Also, the generic functi
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:40:17 +
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:03:45PM +0100, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > From: Rabin Vincent
> >
> > ARM has a few system calls (most notably mmap) for which the names of
> > the functions which are referenced in the syscall table d
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:03:45PM +0100, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> From: Rabin Vincent
>
> ARM has a few system calls (most notably mmap) for which the names of
> the functions which are referenced in the syscall table do not match the
> names of the syscall tracepoints. As a consequence of this,
From: Rabin Vincent
ARM has a few system calls (most notably mmap) for which the names of
the functions which are referenced in the syscall table do not match the
names of the syscall tracepoints. As a consequence of this, these
tracepoints are not made available. Implement
arch_syscall_match_s
5 matches
Mail list logo
