On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:15:26AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Po-Yu Chuang
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Will,
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:14:58AM +01
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:15:26AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Po-Yu Chuang
> wrote:
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> >>> Will,
> >>> I guess nobody noti
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>>> Will,
>>> I guess nobody noticed this because the MMU of later v7 processors
>>> fetches page table
>>> from
Hi Will,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>> Will,
>> I guess nobody noticed this because the MMU of later v7 processors
>> fetches page table
>> from D-cache. It even doesn't need to clean pmd to PoU.
>
> It does
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> Will,
> I guess nobody noticed this because the MMU of later v7 processors
> fetches page table
> from D-cache. It even doesn't need to clean pmd to PoU.
It does if it's UP. The walker is only guaranteed to read from L1 if you
have th
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 28 May 2013 07:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:03:36PM +0100, Sricharan R wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 28 May 2013 06:35 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
On Tuesday 28 May 2013 07:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:03:36PM +0100, Sricharan R wrote:
>> On Tuesday 28 May 2013 06:35 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
This bug was introduced in commit e651eab0.
Some v4/v
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 02:05:02PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> > This bug was introduced in commit e651eab0.
> > Some v4/v5 platforms failed to boot due to this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:03:36PM +0100, Sricharan R wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 May 2013 06:35 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> >> This bug was introduced in commit e651eab0.
> >> Some v4/v5 platforms failed to boot due to this.
> >>
> >> Signe
On Tuesday 28 May 2013 06:35 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>> This bug was introduced in commit e651eab0.
>> Some v4/v5 platforms failed to boot due to this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |4 +++-
>> 1 fi
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
> This bug was introduced in commit e651eab0.
> Some v4/v5 platforms failed to boot due to this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a
This bug was introduced in commit e651eab0.
Some v4/v5 platforms failed to boot due to this.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
---
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index e0d8565..19a43f8 100644
--- a/arch/
12 matches
Mail list logo