On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 10:22:06 PM CEST Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> oak uses NCR5380. NCR5380 is shared across multiple architectures
> which have a random selection of NO_IRQ defined as 0 or -1. To
> convert this without regression takes a multi-step process:
>
> 1. Verify all arch
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:03:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> >
> > My point still stands though. Merely hiding it doesn't make the problem
> > go away - it's just the same problem but now it won't be as visible, and
> > as
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:19:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The patch was correct, the only problem that you pointed out already
> was that it needs to be applied on top of your patch. I didn't
> check when the file was touched the last time but only looked at
> the current state in linux-next
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:44:43 PM CEST Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:28:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 3:24:42 PM CEST Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:07:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
>
> My point still stands though. Merely hiding it doesn't make the problem
> go away - it's just the same problem but now it won't be as visible, and
> as such it'll probably never get resolved.
How much of a legacy thing is this?
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:28:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 3:24:42 PM CEST Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:07:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > The mmp platform has its own definitions with the old NO_IRQ meaning,
> > > but com
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 3:24:42 PM CEST Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:07:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The mmp platform has its own definitions with the old NO_IRQ meaning,
> > but compares against the global NO_IRQ macro that we should have
> > removed l
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:07:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The mmp platform has its own definitions with the old NO_IRQ meaning,
> but compares against the global NO_IRQ macro that we should have
> removed long ago.
>
> The specific usage in arch/arm/mach-mmp/devices.c is awkward, but
> fixi
The mmp platform has its own definitions with the old NO_IRQ meaning,
but compares against the global NO_IRQ macro that we should have
removed long ago.
The specific usage in arch/arm/mach-mmp/devices.c is awkward, but
fixing it properly would require a larger scale rewrite of the entire
file, or
9 matches
Mail list logo
