Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: arbitrarily set first interrupt number

2014-12-04 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Robert Jarzmik writes: > As IRQ0, the legacy timer interrupt should not be used as an interrupt > number, shift the interrupts by a fixed number. > > As we had in a special case a shift of 16 when ISA bus was used on a > PXA, use that value as the first interrupt number, regardless of ISA or >

Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: arbitrarily set first interrupt number

2014-12-04 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes: As IRQ0, the legacy timer interrupt should not be used as an interrupt number, shift the interrupts by a fixed number. As we had in a special case a shift of 16 when ISA bus was used on a PXA, use that value as the first interrupt number,

[PATCH] ARM: pxa: arbitrarily set first interrupt number

2014-11-24 Thread Robert Jarzmik
As IRQ0, the legacy timer interrupt should not be used as an interrupt number, shift the interrupts by a fixed number. As we had in a special case a shift of 16 when ISA bus was used on a PXA, use that value as the first interrupt number, regardless of ISA or not. Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik

[PATCH] ARM: pxa: arbitrarily set first interrupt number

2014-11-24 Thread Robert Jarzmik
As IRQ0, the legacy timer interrupt should not be used as an interrupt number, shift the interrupts by a fixed number. As we had in a special case a shift of 16 when ISA bus was used on a PXA, use that value as the first interrupt number, regardless of ISA or not. Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik