On Sep 24, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/24/14 11:20, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need
>> to update this for every board going forward. Also added "qcom,msm8974"
>> to the list as we support "qcom,apq8074" already (the
On 09/24/14 11:20, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need
> to update this for every board going forward. Also added "qcom,msm8974"
> to the list as we support "qcom,apq8074" already (the modemless version
> of "qcom,msm8974").
>
>
Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need
to update this for every board going forward. Also added "qcom,msm8974"
to the list as we support "qcom,apq8074" already (the modemless version
of "qcom,msm8974").
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
arch/arm/mach-qcom/board.c |
Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need
to update this for every board going forward. Also added qcom,msm8974
to the list as we support qcom,apq8074 already (the modemless version
of qcom,msm8974).
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
---
On 09/24/14 11:20, Kumar Gala wrote:
Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need
to update this for every board going forward. Also added qcom,msm8974
to the list as we support qcom,apq8074 already (the modemless version
of qcom,msm8974).
Signed-off-by: Kumar
On Sep 24, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Stephen Boyd sb...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 09/24/14 11:20, Kumar Gala wrote:
Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need
to update this for every board going forward. Also added qcom,msm8974
to the list as we support qcom,apq8074
6 matches
Mail list logo
