On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 11:28:56AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:29:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:29:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/ar
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S
>> b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A bugfix for the SMP case broke the build for the UP case:
>
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.o: In function `shmobile_boot_apmu':
> (.text+0x34): undefined reference to `secondary_startup'
>
> The assembler file mixes code that
A bugfix for the SMP case broke the build for the UP case:
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.o: In function `shmobile_boot_apmu':
(.text+0x34): undefined reference to `secondary_startup'
The assembler file mixes code that is used for SMP with code
that we also need on a single-CPU build, so I'm
5 matches
Mail list logo