Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: Fix initialisation order for UIBs

2012-09-26 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > An earlier change prevented User Interface Boards (UIBs) from being > initialised on boards which did not support them. This change had > the undesired effect of reordering the UIB initialisation calls with > I2C registration. Here we ensure

Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: Fix initialisation order for UIBs

2012-09-26 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: An earlier change prevented User Interface Boards (UIBs) from being initialised on boards which did not support them. This change had the undesired effect of reordering the UIB initialisation calls with I2C registration.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: Fix initialisation order for UIBs

2012-09-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > > An earlier change prevented User Interface Boards (UIBs) from being > initialised on boards which did not support them. This change had > the undesired effect of reordering the UIB initialisation calls with > I2C registration. Here we ensure UIBs

[PATCH] ARM: ux500: Fix initialisation order for UIBs

2012-09-25 Thread Lee Jones
An earlier change prevented User Interface Boards (UIBs) from being initialised on boards which did not support them. This change had the undesired effect of reordering the UIB initialisation calls with I2C registration. Here we ensure UIBs are only setup after all required infrastructure is

[PATCH] ARM: ux500: Fix initialisation order for UIBs

2012-09-25 Thread Lee Jones
An earlier change prevented User Interface Boards (UIBs) from being initialised on boards which did not support them. This change had the undesired effect of reordering the UIB initialisation calls with I2C registration. Here we ensure UIBs are only setup after all required infrastructure is

Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: Fix initialisation order for UIBs

2012-09-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Lee Jones wrote: An earlier change prevented User Interface Boards (UIBs) from being initialised on boards which did not support them. This change had the undesired effect of reordering the UIB initialisation calls with I2C registration. Here we ensure UIBs are