Re: [PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-30 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 > disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to > reference the individual function entry points that are provided by > kernel/sys_ni.c

Re: [PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-30 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 > disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to > reference the individual function entry points that are provided by > kernel/sys_ni.c

Re: [PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-25 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 > disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to > reference the individual function entry points that are provided by > kernel/sys_ni.c

Re: [PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-25 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 > disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to > reference the individual function entry points that are provided by > kernel/sys_ni.c

Re: [PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-23 Thread Will Deacon
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 > disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to > reference the individual function entry points that are provided by > kernel/sys_ni.c

Re: [PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-23 Thread Will Deacon
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 > disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to > reference the individual function entry points that are provided by > kernel/sys_ni.c

[PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to reference the individual function entry points that are provided by kernel/sys_ni.c in this case, and the declarations are hidden inside of #ifdef

[PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16

2015-11-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16 disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to reference the individual function entry points that are provided by kernel/sys_ni.c in this case, and the declarations are hidden inside of #ifdef