Hi Alex,
> On 18/09/2019 11:41:14+0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a
>> possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1]
>>
>> Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a
>> critical section protected
On 18/09/2019 11:41:14+0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a
> possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1]
>
> Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a
> critical section protected by spinlock.
>
A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a
possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1]
Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a
critical section protected by spinlock.
However this spinlock is only used in atmel_ssc_shutdown() and
3 matches
Mail list logo