Re: [PATCH] ASoC: da7219: Allow pdata to specify a VDDIO

Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on asoc/for-next] [also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc5 next-20180720] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-c

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: da7219: Allow pdata to specify a VDDIO

Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on asoc/for-next] [also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc5 next-20180720] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-c

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: da7219: Allow pdata to specify a VDDIO

Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on asoc/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc5 next-20180720] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/

[PATCH] ASoC: da7219: Allow pdata to specify a VDDIO

Some systems do not have software controllable regulators driving the DA7219's supplies, nor can they use device tree to create "always-on fixed regulators" to easily pretend like they do. On these systems the call to devm_regulator_bulk_get() just creates a set of dummy registers. Calling regula