Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: set correct platform drvdata in pcm030_fabric_probe()

2013-11-12 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 08:41:14AM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: > From: Wei Yongjun > > platform_set_drvdata(op, pdata) in pcm030_fabric_probe() > will be overwrited when calling snd_soc_register_card(card), Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: set correct platform drvdata in pcm030_fabric_probe()

2013-11-12 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 08:41:14AM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn platform_set_drvdata(op, pdata) in pcm030_fabric_probe() will be overwrited when calling snd_soc_register_card(card), Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[PATCH] ASoC: fsl: set correct platform drvdata in pcm030_fabric_probe()

2013-11-08 Thread Wei Yongjun
From: Wei Yongjun platform_set_drvdata(op, pdata) in pcm030_fabric_probe() will be overwrited when calling snd_soc_register_card(card), but cm030_fabric_remove() use drvdata as a type of struct pcm030_audio_data, so we should move platform_set_drvdata() below snd_soc_register_card() call.

[PATCH] ASoC: fsl: set correct platform drvdata in pcm030_fabric_probe()

2013-11-08 Thread Wei Yongjun
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn platform_set_drvdata(op, pdata) in pcm030_fabric_probe() will be overwrited when calling snd_soc_register_card(card), but cm030_fabric_remove() use drvdata as a type of struct pcm030_audio_data, so we should move platform_set_drvdata() below