Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on ath6kl/ath-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc2 next-20160609]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Prasun-Maiti/Add-set_antenna-callback-in-ath6kl-dr
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on ath6kl/ath-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc2 next-20160609]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Prasun-Maiti/Add-set_antenna-callback-in-ath6kl-dr
Hello Julian,
It was an assumption on my part that the firmware supports a SET
function. I realize it was premature to do so. I am sending another
patch to convert the ath6kl_set_antenna() to a NO-OP. This will take
care of the kernel warning, but would not fire any commands to
firmware. I hope th
Hi Prasun,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Prasun Maiti wrote:
> I am not sure it works fine. Like ath6kl driver send another cmd to
> firmare, I have just filled up the cmd buffer with "tx_ant", and
> "rx_ant" values, then use "ath6kl_wmi_cmd_send()" api to send the cmd
> buffer to firmware.
> I
On 06/08/2016 08:56 AM, Prasun Maiti wrote:
Please help me how to test this one?? It will be great to me if you help me.
I do not have time or interest, sorry. You basically need access to
firmware source to do any useful development on this driver in my opinion,
and I do not have access to th
Please help me how to test this one?? It will be great to me if you help me.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 08:46 AM, Prasun Maiti wrote:
>>
>> Please tell me if I mention that this code is untested in commit log,
>> then could you check the code kindly and also
On 06/08/2016 08:46 AM, Prasun Maiti wrote:
Please tell me if I mention that this code is untested in commit log,
then could you check the code kindly and also help me to fix this type
of warning?
In my experience, ath6kl has very fragile and buggy firmware, so I would
not add any new API to it
Please tell me if I mention that this code is untested in commit log,
then could you check the code kindly and also help me to fix this type
of warning?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Prasun Maiti writes:
>
>> I am not sure it works fine. Like ath6kl driver send another cmd
Prasun Maiti writes:
> I am not sure it works fine. Like ath6kl driver send another cmd to
> firmare, I have just filled up the cmd buffer with "tx_ant", and
> "rx_ant" values, then use "ath6kl_wmi_cmd_send()" api to send the cmd
> buffer to firmware. I have resend the patch as there are some err
I am not sure it works fine. Like ath6kl driver send another cmd to
firmare, I have just filled up the cmd buffer with "tx_ant", and
"rx_ant" values, then use "ath6kl_wmi_cmd_send()" api to send the cmd
buffer to firmware.
I have resend the patch as there are some errors in the previous patch.
Let
Prasun Maiti writes:
> No. I did not any test for that case.
> This driver create a new wiphy for use with cfg80211 through
> "wiphy_new_nm" api, but in this api, I found that more warnings for
> inconsistent ops are added there. e.g; "WARN_ON(ops->set_antenna &&
> !ops->get_antenna);"
> So, warn
Hi,
[auto build test WARNING on ath6kl/ath-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.7-rc2 next-20160608]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Prasun-Maiti/Add-set_antenna-callback-in-ath6k
No. I did not any test for that case.
This driver create a new wiphy for use with cfg80211 through
"wiphy_new_nm" api, but in this api, I found that more warnings for
inconsistent ops are added there. e.g; "WARN_ON(ops->set_antenna &&
!ops->get_antenna);"
So, warning comes during creation of a new
Prasun Maiti writes:
> Since add more warnings for inconsistent ops in cfg80211, the wireless
> core warns if a driver implements a cfg80211 callback but doesn't
> implements the inverse operation. The ath6kl driver implements a cfg80211
> .get_antenna operation handler but doesn't have the inver
Since add more warnings for inconsistent ops in cfg80211, the wireless
core warns if a driver implements a cfg80211 callback but doesn't
implements the inverse operation. The ath6kl driver implements a cfg80211
.get_antenna operation handler but doesn't have the inverse .set_antenna
callback. So, i
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on ath6kl/ath-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc2 next-20160608]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Prasun-Maiti/Add-set_antenna-callback-in-ath6kl-dr
Since add more warnings for inconsistent ops in cfg80211, the wireless
core warns if a driver implements a cfg80211 callback but doesn't
implements the inverse operation. The ath6kl driver implements a cfg80211
.get_antenna operation handler but doesn't have the inverse .set_antenna
callback. So, i
17 matches
Mail list logo