On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:49:47AM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> Didn't realize the patch was sent to linux-kernel (that I don't
> subscribe) instead of linux-aio - revised patch attached. Thanks for the
> help Wendy
Okay, applied. Thanks!
-ben
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
Also, please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on future aio patches.
Didn't realize the patch was sent to linux-kernel (that I don't
subscribe) instead of linux-aio - revised patch attached. Thanks for the
help Wendy
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 03:06:52PM -0400, Wendy Cheng
Hello Wendy,
Two things: your patch needs to be properly signed off on. Read
Documentation/SubmittingPatches for a description of what that entials.
Secondly, your patch adds whitespace on the end of the else. Aside
from that, the printk should be removed -- just replace it with the
ret = -
Previously sent via private mail that doesn't seem to go thru - resend
via office mailer.
Note that other than few exceptions, most of the current filesystem
and/or drivers do not have aio cancel specifically defined
(kiob->ki_cancel field is mostly NULL). However, sys_io_cancel system
call u
Other than few exceptions (e.g. usb/gadget), none of
the current filesystems and/or drivers that has
io_cancel implemented (kiocb->ki_cancel left with
NULL). However, the io_cancel() system call
(sys_io_cancel) somehow universally sets return code
to -EAGAIN. This gives us a false impression that
i
5 matches
Mail list logo
